The time I post these are always
contrary to the time I write them. FYI, it is currently 1:48 AM.
I—cannot—sleep.
To the matter at hand.
Now. Normally when a normal person
reads a fantasy book, they feel the need to go back to the real world with a
life-fiction, as I call them. For me, it’s the other way around. I can only
take so much life-fiction before I have to delve back into the realm of the
speculatively concrete world of fantasy, where anything is possible. To test a
popular CBA author, I wanted to read one of her most recent books that my
mother just so happened to have (thanks, Mom!). House of Secrets by Tracie Peterson . . . the cover entranced me.
Usually books have elaborate layouts with inset text giving reviews or little
teaser taglines. Not House of Secrets.
The cover is simply three sisters holding each other in a family embrace, their
backs turned to the viewer, and a forest in front of them. The title and
author’s name are simply typed onto the picture in such a plain way, I was
immediately drawn to the novel. Which is unusual, considering a year ago, I
probably would have never considered this book to be on my TBR list.
Anyway, to the writing. Bailee
Cooper, the main character and oldest Cooper sister, had a distinct-ish voice.
You could tell that she was trying to keep the family secrets and keep her
sisters safe from what she thought would harm them. However, something about
her felt a little too plain. A little too . . . expected. This was the case
with most of the characters in the novel. Too much expectedness.
A lot of the book involved talking,
too. I mean, don’t get me wrong; novels are comprised of 85% dialogue. It’s
what moves the story forward. But a little action now and then wouldn’t hurt,
and I’m not talking about cooking a simple meal. Yeah, that’s action, but when
the meal is alluded to instead of some talking while cooking (seeing as how the sisters had some special
spaghetti recipe) irked me. Instead the talking was done mostly around seating
areas and the seaside. These intimate spaces served well for the dialogue
exchange but impeded any real movement that could have added to both the
characters’ personalities and the story’s lack of action.
Dialogue aside, there were few
twists, and the one I didn’t completely see coming wasn’t all shocking because
I had a niggle about it anyway. I think that Geena, the second-oldest Cooper
sister, should have been diagnosed with their mother’s psychological disease to
make things more intense. Geena could have added a lot of tension with
normality one second, craziness the second. That would have been a twist we
wouldn’t have seen coming but only suspected, because Piper, the youngest
Cooper, displayed signs of the illness (I won’t tell you what it was in case
you want to read the book). It turned out that Piper only had hypothyroidism,
not the mental illness, but Geena should
have had it. I can only grieve the lost action and detail that could have
been added, the tension that could have smoked things up.
Now, these aren’t the major reason I
had a problem with the novel. My biggest irk was the romance plot.
It—was—blatant—and—obvious. Bailee hardly struggled with herself, Mark seemed
far too perfect to be human, and their kiss? Pah. I expected fireworks. I got a
sparkler. A good novel is supposed to make you feel. I felt nothing. I wanted
more heat, more struggle, more undeniable passion that made the two unable to
stay away from each other, but Bailee could have fought against that even more
and made the first kiss that much more explosive! Sadly, it didn’t happen.
All in all, I wouldn’t call House of Secrets a bad book. It was good
to read. Easy. But it didn’t challenge me. Not in life or faith or writing
skill. And I never got punched in the face. (A good book always punches you in
the face somehow.) Tracie Peterson kinda fell flat on this one, folks. Five
flipped pages out of Ten.
No comments:
Post a Comment